Festive activities

Come along and join us in Hillhead library for our Christmas craft fair on the 22nd of November, 10-4pm. Children can enter the drawing competition.

ChristmasCompetition

ChrPoster'14a

Everybody needs good neighbours…

The Children's Wood has reached Level 4 on the It's Your Neighbourhood Awards 2014.

The Children’s Wood is thriving having reached Level 4 (of 5) on the It’s Your Neighbourhood Awards 2014.

The Children’s Wood Makes Glasgow

images

We are delighted to announce that The Children’s Wood was a finalist in the environmental category of the ‘People Make Glasgow’ Inspiring City Awards.  As one of the only non-professional outfits on the shortlist, it’s a testament to the volunteers, teachers, and parents who contribute to running and organising events.

A big thank-you to everyone, you make the Children’s Wood!

http://herald-events.com/inspiringcity/

Halloween and Freecycle events!

In the coming months we have three more events on the cards including our spooky Hallowe’en celebrations, and another freecycle event.  Check out these beautiful flyers from our volunteer flyer-artist in residence -

Craft HALLOWEEN'14 FreeC'14

Do get in touch if you feel you can donate a few hours to help us in run events on the day or organising beforehand, every hour helps lighten the load!

Glasgow Wildlife Garden Festival.

Glasgow Wildlife Garden Festival

Groups come together to offer three weeks of wild fun in Glasgow with long-term ambition of creating more urban homes for nature. The Children’s Wood are excited to be involved.

The Glasgow Wildlife Garden Festival launched on the 9th of September with a flower bike ride which Tam Dean Burn was involved with. They came to the wood and planted seeds. The three weeks of events are designed to encourage people in the city to get closer to wildlife.

Over 20 organisations and six schools are involved in the festival, which offers a wide-range of activities, from storytelling to canoe trips. There will be an outdoor screening of the film Project Wild Thing, foraging walks, art events, open days, and even jam making.

The festival is part of Giving Nature a Home in Glasgow, an RSPB Scotland flagship initiative that aims to bring people together to create more space for the wildlife that shares our city.
RSPB Scotland’s Fiona Weir, said: “Glasgow is a city that’s bursting with exciting wildlife, but it’s easily overlooked. We’re hoping this festival will help to re-connect people in Glasgow with the city’s hidden green spaces, as well as inspiring them to get outside and do something for nature!

“We’ve tried to include as many opportunities and events as possible at sites across the city, to give everyone and anyone the chance to get involved. Many of the events are free, most are suitable for families and children, and you certainly don’t need to know anything about wildlife to come along and take part.”

Sites and organisations involved include Glasgow Botanic Gardens, Kelvingrove Art Gallery and Museum, the Tramway, Grow Wild Scotland, Glasgow Life and Glasgow City Council. Several community gardens are also taking part, including Cranhill Park, North Kelvin Meadow, Woodlands Community Garden, Govanhill Baths and Shettleston Community Growing Project.

Emily Cutts from Children’s Wood at North Kelvin Meadow, said: “Glasgow has great parks and green spaces, however many are underused and undervalued. As a consequence both nature and people have been suffering. The Wildlife Garden Festival is a great opportunity to celebrate nature and to encourage people outside more.

“Wildlife plays an important role in the health and well-being within any city and it’s great to see it becoming the central focus across Glasgow in September. Hopefully people can build on these events to create a more sustainable and flourishing city. We’re proud to be playing a part in this process.”

Artwork for the festival showing a stylized map in the shape of a swift, has been created by Glasgow artist Libby Walker. The map shows some of the key species that specially chosen ‘ambassador’ schools will be helping to champion during the festival and in the longer term, including bumblebees, house sparrows, hedgehogs and water voles.

The Children’s Wood will have activities running for 14 local schools over the festival, a weekly Saturday Outdoor Learning Club for all ages of children 10-12pm and a Wednesday outdoor playgroup 10-12pm.

More information about the Glasgow Wildlife Garden Festival can be found at http://www.rspb.org.uk/thingstodo/glasgow and http://www.glasgowwildlifefestival.org.

Children’s Wood education group

Children’s Wood education group, which is made up of mostly local teachers, have helped to create an education pack as part of Tam’s Book’s on a Bike legacy. We’d like to thank Joni MacKay, Susie Marshall, Anna Cook, Claire Mceachran and Sorcha Dallas. The pack will be on our website soon, and we’ll be handing out some of these activities at our Garden Festival events on the 11th and 23rd of September.

Pages from SEPTEMBER Magazine_Layout 1

Spending time on NKM and CW can improve attention in primary aged children

The Children’s Wood collaborated with Glasgow University Psychology Department on a study looking at attention in primary school aged children. The study explored the attention span of local children after being in the Children’s Wood and North Kelvin Meadow. Attention span is an important ingredient for academic success and learning. The study found that there was a statistically signifiant impact on children’s attention after spending time in the playgroup compared to after time in the classroom. There was an even bigger effect on attention after children spent time on North Kelvin Meadow and Children’s Wood. Below is a shortened report of the study by psychology student Ieva who led the study.

Investigation of the potential impact of outdoor play on attention in primary school children

Interim Summary of the Original Report

The present research has based its idea upon the Attention Restoration Theory and its potential value in the early years classroom settings. The research was conducted by a Year 4 Honours Psychology student at the University of Glasgow (under the supervision of a member of academic staff) in partnership with the Children’s Wood based in the North Kelvin Meadow. The purpose of this interim summary is to provide information on the underpinning theory, methodology, and results of the research mentioned as well as details of discussion points developed within the original write-up.

Attention Restorative Theory (ART) has emerged from the field of Environmental Psychology and it argues that human beings have two types of attention (Kaplan, 1995); one is called ‘directed attention’ and is directed by cognitive-control processes (Berman, Jonides, & Kaplan, 2008) i.e. requires suppression of distracting stimuli and this is effortful and tiring. In everyday life it involves writing, reading, driving, etc. Directed attention, however, is not an infinite resource therefore when attention fatigue occurs individuals experience a condition often referred to as mental fatigue (Felsten, 2009). Nonetheless, this resource can be restored when indirect attention is engaged letting the direct attention rest (de Kort, Meijnders, Sponselee, & Ijsselsteijn, 2006), in other words, by engaging the other type of attention, so called ‘involuntary’ or ‘automatic’ attention. Involuntary attention occurs when we automatically attend to patterns that are difficult not to attend to e.g. fire, running water, wild animals, etc. In these cases, attention is drawn involuntarily because the stimuli are naturally fascinating. As a function of these fascinating objects/environments being so attractive people do not have to spend energy suppressing the distracting stimuli therefore allowing their directed attentional system rest and recover. Within this theory, therefore, it is argued that decreased exposure to nature and outdoor play has potentially impacted on children’s cognitive functioning and that this decline could be mediated if children could spend more time outdoors where involuntary attention is used by large (Taylor et al., 2002).

To investigate this, present research extended the previous research findings in the field by examining how natural environment during school lunch break time can support attentional functioning of primary school children. The study compared children’s attention after the usual school lunch breaks in the classroom and in the school playground to that of non-routine lunch time experiences, off the school premises, in the nearby meadow. The experimental design included three settings – a lunch break in the meadow, in the school playground, and lunch break inside the school in the classroom. Within-subject design was used where participants were tested after the exposure to each of the conditions with gender serving as a between-subject factor. The outdoor natural site was the North Kelvin Meadow and Children’s Wood, a large public green-space area and home for the Children’s Wood community initiative in Glasgow, located approximately 15 minute walk away from the school facility. Both the classroom and the playground settings were standard for a primary school in Glasgow. The participants in this study were 24 primary school pupils; 12 boys 12 girls. The average age of children was 6.6 years. Digit Backward Span (DBS) test was used to assess the changes in participants’ attentional capacities. It involved reading out loud a sequence of digits to an individual participant (e.g. 3-1-8) and asking him/her to repeat the sequence aloud in reverse order (e.g. 8-1-3). After a correct response, participants were given a new, longer sequence with series’ length increasing as the test proceeded; after an incorrect response, respondents were given a new but same length sequence to attempt. The overall score of DBS test was the number of digits in the longest sequence successfully reversed following the two consecutive failed trials (Wechsler, 1955). The procedure involved multiple researchers recording each child’s attention span using the DBS test after each of the lunch break conditions: indoors, in the wood and meadow, and in the school playground. Data collection took place between mid to late January once the children’s school routines were well established. After the test was finished, each child was then asked to answer four questions indicating whether their lunch break was – boring, relaxing, interesting and fun; all answers were recorded using likert-type scale from 1 to 3, where 1 indicated – not at all, 2 – a little, and 3 – very much. Once the questions were answered, the researchers then called the next child in the list and performed the same procedure.

The findings indicated the positive effects of the natural environment on DBS scores as can be seen in Figure 1. (Please email childrenswood@hotmail.com to access the graph as it couldn’t be uploaded!)

Expressed in terms of number of digits recalled at each occasion, the performance following exposure to the Meadow settings was higher than after the playground and the classroom conditions (Meadow – M = 3.54 SD=.736; Playground – M = 3.17, SD = .67; Classroom – M = 2.9, SD = .57).
Mixed-method ANOVA showed significant results for the difference in the DBS scores between the three conditions tested yet no gender differences were found. The lunch break in the meadow was also rated most positively.

The DBS scores for the three conditions were compared using a 3×2 mixed-design ANOVA. A statistically significant main effect was found between the types of environment participants experienced during their lunch break, where F(2,44) = 12.026, p < .001.

Expressed in terms of number of digits recalled at each occasion, the performance following exposure to the Meadow settings was higher than after the playground and the classroom conditions (Meadow – M = 3.54 SD=.736; Playground – M = 3.17, SD = .67; Classroom – M = 2.9, SD = .57).
Mixed-method ANOVA showed significant results for the difference in the DBS scores between the three conditions tested yet no gender differences were found. The lunch break in the meadow was also rated most positively.
The DBS scores for the three conditions were compared using a 3×2 mixed-design ANOVA. A statistically significant main effect was found between the types of environment participants experienced during their lunch break, where F(2,44) = 12.026, p < .001. The result tells us that, regardless of the gender of the child, exposure to the natural surrounding affected the participants’ attention span more positively than indoor or school playground surroundings. However, there was no statistically significant main effect for ‘gender’: F(2, 44) = .092, p = .764. This tells us that in general both boys and girls performed similarly across the three conditions and the predicted gender difference was not evident in this sample. Finally, there was no significant interaction between gender and the type of lunch break environment F=.513, p = .602. As a function of the condition experienced, both male and female children increased their attentional functioning equally. Finally, by large, the outdoor condition was consistently rated as more fun, interesting, relaxing and less boring lunch break setting than the other two.

To sum up, as predicted in the first hypothesis, following the lunch break in the natural outdoor setting, performances increased significantly higher than after the lunch breaks in the other two settings. The performances, however, increased significantly higher after the lunch break in the school playground as well, as compared to that of the classroom setting. One of the key findings of this study, therefore, was that even though the attentional functioning was at its highest following the time spent in nature, the playground lunch break condition increased pupils’ attentional functioning as well which takes us back to the Attention Restoration Theory as follows. The school playground settings provide the hard type of fascination like sports and other kinds of entertainment and, therefore, have an intermediate restorative potential. Natural settings, on the other hand, being a source of soft fascination or, in other words, effortless attention that does not require inhibition of distracting stimuli, have the highest restorative potential, thus the results.

Finally, there were a number of implications for practice of the present study. If, as present study suggests, nature is a viable tool for enhancing one’s ability to attend in a school environment, there may be numerous ways in which schools could administer and modulate both the access to the natural areas and the presence of natural elements within school environment itself in order to boost this effect. School curriculums should consider incorporating larger time slots dedicated for outdoor learning. Physical education and/or environment based classes of curricula could all be delivered in an outdoor environment. It does not involve any unusual risks or side effects, there is no social stigma attached to the fact that one spends a lot of time in the nature. What is more, even if, as suggested by Waters & Maynard, 2010, pre-defined learning outcomes can only be achieved through the use of certainly ordered space, the ruff and unkempt space that is most stimulating may easily sit aside providing the same benefits. Schools shall consider implementing natural settings inside the school facilities as well as in the school playgrounds. Trees, shrubs, flower beds and vegetable gardens are all elements of nature that, according to this as well as numerous other researches (Rich, 2007; Shibata & Suzuki, 2001, 2002, 2004), will not only increase pupils’ attentional functioning but will also serve an educational purpose.

To conclude, the study, therefore, suggests that preserving this type of spaces in the inner city areas and organising children to access it on a regular basis is of high importance, given the profound impact that the ability to concentrate has on one’s educational achievement. Nature therapy shall be better integrated into the health-care system, experiences of the natural environments into our classrooms, satisfaction into our lives. And, it is not a matter of going back to the free-range childhood of the previous centuries but rather a better understanding of principles of healthy child development, were a sense of connection to the world is created through the use of outdoor natural spaces.

REFERENCE LIST

Aziz, N., Said, I. (2012). The Trends and Influential Factors of Children’s Use of Outdoor Environments: A Review. Social and Behavioral Sciences 38, 204 – 212.

Bentsen, P., Jensen, F. S., Mygind, E., Randrup, T. B. (2010). The extent and dissemination of udeskole in Danish schools. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9, 235–243.

Berman, M., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008). The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1207-1212.

Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 249-259.

Berto, R., Massaccesi, S., & Pasini, M. (2008). Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan’s fascination hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 185-191.

Berto, R., Baroni, M. R., Zainaghi, A., Bettella, S. (2010). An exploratory study of the effect of high and low fascination environments on attentional fatigue. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 494–500.

Blakely, K. S. (1994). Parents’ conceptions of social dangers to children in the urban environment. Children’s Environments, 11(1), 20-35.

Bond, D. (Director). (2013). Project Wild Thing [Motion Picture].

Canin, L. H. (1991). Psychological restoration among AIDS caregivers: Maintaining self-care. Unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Castonguay, G., & Jutras, S. (2010). Children’s use of the outdoor environment in a low-income Montreal neighborhood. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 200-230.

Cimprich, B. (1993a). Development of an intervention to restore attention in cancer patients. Cancer Nursing, 16, 83-92.

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.

Culham, J., Brandt, S., Cavanagh, P., Kanwisher, N., Dale, A., & Tootell, R. (1998). Cortical fMRI activation produced by attention tracking of moving targets. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2657–2670.

Cutler, M. D., Glaeser E. L., & Shapiro, J. M. (2003). Why Have Americans Become More Obese? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 93-118.

de Kort, Y. A. W., Meijnders, A. L., Sponselee, A. A. G., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2006). What’s wrong with virtual trees? Restoring from stress in a mediated environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 309–320.

Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C. (2001a). Views of nature and self-discipline: evidence from inner-city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22, 49–63.

Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C. (2001b). Coping with ADD: the surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior 33, 54–77.

Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders 12, 402–409.

Felsten, G. (2009). Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 160-167.

Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The Natural Environment as a Playground for Children: The Impact of Outdoor Play Activities in Pre-Primary School Children. Early Childhood Education Journal, (29)2, 111-117.

Gulwadi, G. B. (2009). Restorative home environments for family caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 197–204.

Hart, C. H., & Sheehan, R. (1986). Preschoolers’ play behavior in outdoor environments: Effects on traditional and contemporary playgrounds. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 668-678.

Hartig, T., Mang, M., Evans, G.W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment & Behavior, 23(1), 3-26.

Hartig, T., Korpela, K. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 221-233.

Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., Bowler, P. A. (1997). Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness (Working Paper #5). Gävle, Sweden: Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala University.

Hartig, T., Evans, G.W., Jamner, L.D., Davis, D.S., & Garling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–123.

Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, A., Knotts, D. J. (1997). Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 17, 165–170.
Higgins, P., Nicol, R., Ross, H., (2006). Teacher’s approaches and attitudes to engaging with the natural heritage through the curriculum. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No 161, Edinburgh.
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15, 169–182.

Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 480–506.

Kaplan, S., Berman, M. G. (2010). Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(1), 43-57.

Kernan, M. (2010). Outdoor affordances in early childhood education and care setting: Adults’ and children’ perspectives. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(1), 152-177.

Kjellgren, A., Buhrkall, H. (2010). A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 464–472.

Kuo, F.E., 2001. Coping with poverty: impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior 33(1), 5–34.

Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001a). Aggression and violence in the inner city: Effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 543–571.

Kuo, F.E., & Sullivan, W.C. (2001b). Environment and crime in the inner-city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33, 343–367.

Kuo, F.E., & Faber Taylor, A. (2004) A Potential Natural Treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence From a National Study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580-1586.

Laumann, K., Garling, T., & Stormark, K. M. (2003). Selective attention and heart rate responses to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 125–134.

Lezak, M. D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mackworth, J. F. (1976). Development of attention. In V. Hamilton & M. Vernon (Eds.), The development of cognitive process (pp. 111-152). London: Academic Press.

Mårtensson, F., Boldemann, C., Soderstromc, M., Blennowe, M., Englund, J.E., Grahn, P. (2009) Outdoor environmental assessment of attention promoting settings for preschool children. Health & Place, 15, 1149–1157.

Mesulam, M. (1985). Principles of behavioral neurology. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Moore, R. C. (1986) Childhood’s Domain: Place and Play in Child Development. Croom Helm, London.

New Economics Foundation, 2004. The Power and Potential of Well-Being Indicators: Measuring Young People’s Well-Being in Nottingham. Retrieved November 22nd, 2013 from http://s.bsd.net/nefoundation/default/page/file/fc446058e067754539_xwm6vurfq.pdf.

OECD (2011). Health at a Glance: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Olmsted, F. L. (1865). The value and care of parks. Reprinted in Nash, R. (Ed.) (1968), The American Environment: Readings in the history of conservation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 18-24.

Ottosson, J., Grahn, P., 2008. The role of natural settings in crisis rehabilitation: how does the level of crisis influence the response to experiences of nature with regard to measures of rehabilitation? Landscape Research 33(1), 51–70.

Owen, N., Leslie, E., Salmon, J., & Fotheringham, M. (2000). Environmental determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Exercise Sport Sciences Review, 28(4), 153-158.

Peterson, L., Ewigman, B., and Klvlahan, C. (1993). Judgments Regarding Appropriate Child Supervision to Prevent Injury: The Role of Environmental Risk and Child Age. Child Development, 64, 934-950.

Prezza, M. (2007). Children’s independent mobility: A review of recent Italian Literature. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 293-318.

Rich, D. L. (2007). Effects of exposure to nature and plants on cognition and mood: A cognitive psychological perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., Benefield P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.

Roe, J., Aspinall, P. (2011). The restorative outcomes of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10, 205– 212.

Schwartz, D. (1994). The measurement of inhibitory attention and psychological effectiveness among adolescents. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Michigan.

Shaffer, D. R. (1985). Developmental psychology: Theory, research, and applications. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2001). Effects of indoor foliage plants on subjects’ recovery from mental fatigue. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 385-396.

Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 265-272.

Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2004). Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 373-381.

Staats, H., & Hartig, T. (2004). Alone or with a friend: A social context for psychological restoration and environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 199–211.

Tennessen, C. M., & Cimprich, B. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 77-85.

Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may infuence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.

Valentine, G., & McKendick, J. (1997) Children’s Outdoor Play: Exploring Parental Concerns About Children’s Safety and the Changing Nature of Childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), 219-235.

Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2006). Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of influences on children’s active free-play. Health & Place, 12, 383-393.

Veitch, J., Salmon, J., & Ball, K. (2008). Children’s active free play in local neighborhoods: A behavioral mapping study. Health Education Research, 23(5), 870-879.

Waters, J. & Maynard, T. (2010). What’s so interesting outside? A study of child-initiated interaction with teachers in the natural outdoor environment. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18 (4), 473-483.

Wechsler, D. (1955) Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

Wells, N. (2000). At home with nature: effects of ‘greenness’ on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment & Behavior, 32, 775-795.

Werheida, K., Hoppeb, C., Thönea, A., Müllerc, U., Müngersdorfd, M., von Cramon , D. Y. (2002). The Adaptive Digit Ordering Test Clinical application, reliability, and validity of a verbal working memory test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 547–565.